Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-05-08

BIRENDRA PRASAD SAH vs THE STATE OF BIHAR

Citation / case number
SC 2018/27023
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BIRENDRA PRASAD SAH
Respondent
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the Chief Judicial Magistrate had condoned the delay in filing the complaint. The Court emphasized that the issuance of successive legal notices is permissible under Section 138, aligning with the legislative intent. The Court reinstated the proceedings, affirming the validity of the complaint filed within the statutory framework.

BIRENDRA PRASAD SAH vs THE STATE OF BIHAR · Niyam