Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-05-03

GANESAN REP BY ITS POWER AGENT G. RUKMANI GANESAN vs THE COMMISSIONER THE TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS BOARD

Citation / case number
SC 2018/10694
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GANESAN REP BY ITS POWER AGENT G. RUKMANI GANESAN
Respondent
THE COMMISSIONER THE TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS BOARD
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Madras High Court, affirming that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable in appeal proceedings under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959. The Court found that the Commissioner had sufficient cause to condone the delay of 266 days in filing the appeal, and thus the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's writ appeal was justified. The judgment clarified the interpretation of statutory provisions regarding delay in appeals under the Act, reinforcing the applicability of the Limitation Act in such cases.

GANESAN REP BY ITS POWER AGENT G. RUKMANI GANESAN vs THE COMMISSIONER THE TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS BOARD · Niyam