Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-05-01

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARRE KARKHANE NIYAMIT vs ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C 1 .

Citation / case number
SC 2017/1033
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARRE KARKHANE NIYAMIT
Respondent
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C 1 .
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's failure to frame questions as required under Section 260-A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, necessitated a remand of the case for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized that appeals must be heard on the questions framed by the High Court, not merely those proposed by the appellant. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and directed it to decide the appeals afresh on merits in accordance with law.

RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARRE KARKHANE NIYAMIT vs ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C 1 . · Niyam