Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-05-08

M/S. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Unit ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise Raipur

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 450
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Unit ...
Respondent
Commissioner Of Central Excise Raipur
Author
K.M. Joseph
Bench
K.M. Joseph, Uday Umesh Lalit, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether interest is payable on differential excise duty with retrospective effect under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court doubted the correctness of previous judgments in CCE v. SKF India Ltd. and CCE v. International Auto Ltd., leading to a re-evaluation of the legal principles surrounding interest on excise duty. The Court ultimately held that the provisions of Section 11AB apply, affirming the liability of the appellant to pay interest on the differential excise duty assessed.

M/S. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Unit ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise Raipur · Niyam