Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-03-12

NATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2018/46198
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed allegations made by the petitioner regarding the designation of Senior Advocates, asserting that such designations are improperly influenced by personal relationships. The court found the petitioner's comments to be an attempt to intimidate and embarrass the judiciary, emphasizing the importance of maintaining respect for the court's authority. The court reiterated that contempt proceedings can be initiated against lawyers for statements that undermine the judicial process.

NATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam