Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-03-26

CTO ANTI EVASION CIRCLE III RAJASTHAN JAIPUR vs M/S PRASOON ENTERPRISES JAIPUR

Citation / case number
SC 2017/10102
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CTO ANTI EVASION CIRCLE III RAJASTHAN JAIPUR
Respondent
M/S PRASOON ENTERPRISES JAIPUR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Rajasthan High Court's order dated January 5, 2017, which had dismissed the appellant's revision petition. The Court examined the applicability of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003, specifically Section 83, regarding the VAT rate on mobile crane wire ropes. The Court held that the High Court was correct in affirming the Board's decision that the wire ropes are part of the mobile crane and thus subject to the VAT rate specified in Schedule IV, entry 155, rather than the residual entry in Schedule V, which imposes a higher rate.

CTO ANTI EVASION CIRCLE III RAJASTHAN JAIPUR vs M/S PRASOON ENTERPRISES JAIPUR · Niyam