Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-03-15

M. VENKATESWARA RAO vs ANDHRA BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR

Citation / case number
SC 2016/5628
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. VENKATESWARA RAO
Respondent
ANDHRA BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 to employees who resigned before the rules were notified but after their retrospective effective date. The Court held that employees who resigned after the cut-off date of 1.1.1986 but before the rules came into force on 1.11.1993 are entitled to benefits under the Pension Rules, establishing that resignation does not negate eligibility for retrospective benefits. The matter was referred to a larger bench due to divergent judicial views on the issue.

M. VENKATESWARA RAO vs ANDHRA BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR · Niyam