Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-03-15

SADANAND PUTHRAN vs UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2016/33503
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SADANAND PUTHRAN
Respondent
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether employees who resigned before the notification of pension schemes, but after the schemes were made applicable, are entitled to benefits under those schemes. The court noted a divergence in judicial opinions and referred the matter to a larger bench for resolution. The outcome will clarify the rights of employees in similar circumstances regarding pension entitlements.

SADANAND PUTHRAN vs UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. · Niyam