Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-03-06

R. DHANASUNDARI @ R. RAJESWARI vs A.N. UMAKANTH AND ORS

Citation / case number
SC 2006/33122
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R. DHANASUNDARI @ R. RAJESWARI
Respondent
A.N. UMAKANTH AND ORS
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the drawer of a cheque is liable for dishonor if the cheque is returned due to insufficient funds, provided that the payee has issued a notice within the stipulated time. The Court emphasized that the burden of proof lies on the drawer to demonstrate that the cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable debt. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the conviction of the appellant for the offense under Section 138.

R. DHANASUNDARI @ R. RAJESWARI vs A.N. UMAKANTH AND ORS · Niyam