Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-03-08

RAKESH . vs BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/20251
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAKESH .
Respondent
BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. .
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of various provisions under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, particularly focusing on Sections 1, 130, and 131. The Court established that the provisions of the Act are mandatory and must be complied with by employers, emphasizing the importance of employee welfare. The judgment upheld the enforcement of the Act, reinforcing the legal obligation of employers to contribute to the provident fund for their employees.

RAKESH . vs BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. . · Niyam