Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-03-29

P. Surendran vs State By Inspector Of Police

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 356
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P. Surendran
Respondent
State By Inspector Of Police
Author
N.V. Ramana
Bench
N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Madras High Court Registry's refusal to number the anticipatory bail application under the SC/ST Act was incorrect, particularly in light of the 2018 amendment introducing Section 18A, which clarifies that anticipatory bail provisions do not apply to cases under this Act. The Court emphasized that the maintainability of such petitions is a judicial function that must be adjudicated by the appropriate bench. Consequently, the Court directed that the anticipatory bail application should be numbered and heard on its merits.

P. Surendran vs State By Inspector Of Police · Niyam