Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-03-08

Chief General Manager Gujarat Telecom ... vs Manilal Ambalal Patel

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 1547
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chief General Manager Gujarat Telecom ...
Respondent
Manilal Ambalal Patel
Author
K.M. Joseph
Bench
K.M. Joseph, Ashok Bhushan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that there were no pending criminal proceedings against the applicant as of 01.08.2008, thus entitling him to receive the DCRG and Commuted Value of Pension (CVP) along with interest for the delay in payment. The Court emphasized that the Central Administrative Tribunal's order to pay interest was justified under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, as the delay was unwarranted. The appeal by the appellants was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling.

Chief General Manager Gujarat Telecom ... vs Manilal Ambalal Patel · Niyam