Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-03-12

Estate Offr.Haryana Urban Dev.Auth. vs Gopi Chand Atreja

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 1423
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Estate Offr.Haryana Urban Dev.Auth.
Respondent
Gopi Chand Atreja
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Dinesh Maheshwari, Abhay Manohar Sapre

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to dismiss the appellants' second appeal on the grounds of limitation, specifically noting that the delay of 1942 days was inordinate and inadequately explained. The Court emphasized that the appellants, being a statutory authority under the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, had a legal department and should have been aware of the adverse orders against them. Consequently, the Court found no merit in the appeals and affirmed the High Court's ruling.

Estate Offr.Haryana Urban Dev.Auth. vs Gopi Chand Atreja · Niyam