Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-07-15

SUDIN DILIP TALAULIKAR vs POLYCAP WIRES PVT LTD

Citation / case number
SC 2018/12626
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUDIN DILIP TALAULIKAR
Respondent
POLYCAP WIRES PVT LTD
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of conditional leave to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It held that the Second Proviso to sub-Rule 5 of Rule 3 mandates that a condition for deposit cannot be imposed without admissible dues being established. The Court found that the respondent's withdrawal of a prior prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act did not bar the maintainability of the summary suit, affirming the lower court's discretion in ordering the deposit of Rs.30,00,000/- as a condition for leave to defend.

SUDIN DILIP TALAULIKAR vs POLYCAP WIRES PVT LTD · Niyam