Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-07-10

PANKAJ PRAKASH vs UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2017/42320
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PANKAJ PRAKASH
Respondent
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the failure to communicate entries in the Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the years 2010-11 and 2011-12 constituted a violation of the principles established in Dev Dutt v Union of India and reaffirmed in Sukhdev Singh v Union of India. The Court emphasized that all entries in APARs must be disclosed to the employee, as non-communication can lead to prejudice in promotion decisions. The Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's writ petition, thereby allowing the appeal for promotion consideration.

PANKAJ PRAKASH vs UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. · Niyam