Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-07-22

THE STATE OF HARYANA vs SUNDER LAL

Citation / case number
SC 2017/26397
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent
SUNDER LAL
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The Court held that possession must be physically taken for the acquisition to be valid, and since the respondent had not been physically dispossessed, the acquisition had lapsed as per Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The appeal by the State of Haryana was dismissed, affirming the High Court's order for compensation to the landowner.

THE STATE OF HARYANA vs SUNDER LAL · Niyam