Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-07-31

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA vs TARA CHAND

Citation / case number
SC 2017/15524
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Respondent
TARA CHAND
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthan High Court's decision affirming the entitlement of an employee to pro-rata pension upon opting for voluntary retirement under the Central Bank of India Employees Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2001. The Court interpreted Clause 6(ii) of the Scheme in conjunction with the Central Bank of India (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995, establishing that eligibility for voluntary retirement does not negate the right to pension benefits. The appeal by the Central Bank of India was dismissed, reinforcing the legal principle that employees who meet the criteria under the Scheme are entitled to pension benefits as per the Regulations.

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA vs TARA CHAND · Niyam