Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-07-11

THE SECRETARY, MOC, NEW DELHI-1 . vs M/S VINOD AND COMPANY

Citation / case number
SC 2013/25301
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE SECRETARY, MOC, NEW DELHI-1 .
Respondent
M/S VINOD AND COMPANY
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether a claimant under an REP licence qualifies as a consumer under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court held that benefits provided under the Exim policy do constitute a 'service', thereby allowing consumer fora jurisdiction over such claims. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower fora's decisions that directed the payment of the premium and compensation to the respondent.

THE SECRETARY, MOC, NEW DELHI-1 . vs M/S VINOD AND COMPANY · Niyam