Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-07-31

TALAT FATIMA HASAN THROUGH HER CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SH. SYED MEHDI HUSAIN vs NAWAB SYED MURTAZA ALI KHAN (D) BY LRS

Citation / case number
SC 2002/63300
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TALAT FATIMA HASAN THROUGH HER CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SH. SYED MEHDI HUSAIN
Respondent
NAWAB SYED MURTAZA ALI KHAN (D) BY LRS
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of succession to properties declared as private by erstwhile rulers in the context of the accession to India. The court ruled that such succession is governed by the personal law applicable to the ruler rather than the rules of succession related to the 'Gaddi'. This decision clarifies the legal framework surrounding the properties of former rulers post-independence.

TALAT FATIMA HASAN THROUGH HER CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SH. SYED MEHDI HUSAIN vs NAWAB SYED MURTAZA ALI KHAN (D) BY LRS · Niyam