Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-07-29

Maharashtra Chess Association vs Union Of India

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 708
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Maharashtra Chess Association
Respondent
Union Of India
Author
D.Y. Chandrachud
Bench
Indira Banerjee, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that a private agreement cannot oust the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that judicial review is a fundamental aspect of the Constitution's basic structure and cannot be limited by non-statutory contracts. The Court held that the Bombay High Court erred in interpreting Clause 21 of the Constitution and Bye Laws of the All India Chess Federation as creating an absolute bar on its jurisdiction, thus allowing the writ petition to proceed.

Maharashtra Chess Association vs Union Of India · Niyam