Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-07-01

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private ... vs Reynders Label Printing India Private ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 393
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private ...
Respondent
Reynders Label Printing India Private ...
Author
A.M. Khanwilkar
Bench
Ajay Rastogi, A.M. Khanwilkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of the 'group of companies' doctrine under Sections 11(5), 11(9), and 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, determining that a non-signatory party can be included in arbitration proceedings if it is part of a corporate group with a shared intent to be bound by the arbitration agreement. The Court reaffirmed the principles established in Chloro Controls India Private Limited v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc. and Cheran Properties Limited v. Kasturi and Sons Limited, emphasizing the importance of the relationship and commonality of subject matter among the parties. The Court held that the non-signatory respondent could be impleaded in the arbitration proceedings based on the established legal principles.

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private ... vs Reynders Label Printing India Private ... · Niyam