Shre Chaitanya Constructions vs Sudhir Poonumchand Parakh

The Supreme Court addressed a specific performance suit where the High Court initially decreed specific performance in favor of the plaintiff but later recalled its judgment due to the absence of a written Vakalatnama for Respondent No.1's counsel. The Court held that the lack of a formal appointment of counsel invalidated the representation, thus allowing the review petition. The ruling emphasized the necessity of proper legal representation and adherence to procedural norms under the Civil Procedure Code, leading to the restoration of the appeal for a fair hearing.