Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-01-29

HIRANDRA KUMAR vs HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL

Citation / case number
SC 2018/40652
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HIRANDRA KUMAR
Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL
Author
Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975, which set age limits for direct recruitment. The Court held that the age limit provisions do not violate Article 14 and Article 16 of the Constitution, affirming that the rules are reasonable and serve a legitimate state interest. The Court dismissed the petitions challenging the age criteria, upholding the High Court's decision that the petitioners were ineligible due to age restrictions.

HIRANDRA KUMAR vs HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL · Niyam