Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-01-28

R. MUTHUKRISHNAN vs THE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Citation / case number
SC 2016/23266
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R. MUTHUKRISHNAN
Respondent
THE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the amended Rules 14-A, 14-B, 14-C, and 14-D of the High Court of Madras, made under Section 34(1) of the Advocates’ Act, 1961. The Court held that these rules empower the High Court to debar advocates for specific misconduct, including bribery and tampering with court records. The Court upheld the amendments, affirming that they are within the legislative competence and serve the purpose of maintaining the integrity of the legal profession.

R. MUTHUKRISHNAN vs THE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS · Niyam