Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-01-07

SUSHIL THOMAS ABRAHAM vs M/S SKYLINE BUILD. THRU. ITS PARTNER..

Citation / case number
SC 2014/15768
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUSHIL THOMAS ABRAHAM
Respondent
M/S SKYLINE BUILD. THRU. ITS PARTNER..
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the appellant could be classified as an 'indigent person' under Order 33 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for the purpose of filing a civil suit without paying ad valorem court fees. The Court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate his inability to pay the requisite fees, thus affirming the lower courts' decisions to deny his request for indigent status. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the trial court's ruling that the appellant was not entitled to file the suit as an indigent person.

SUSHIL THOMAS ABRAHAM vs M/S SKYLINE BUILD. THRU. ITS PARTNER.. · Niyam