Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-01-09

REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER vs K. JAYACHANDRA ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2013/6343
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
Respondent
K. JAYACHANDRA ETC.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the permissible alterations to motor vehicles under Section 52 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and related rules. The Court held that alterations must comply with the manufacturer's specifications as per the prototype test certificate, and Circular No.7/2006 issued by the Transport Commissioner, Kerala, which denied registration for non-compliance, was valid. The Court upheld the High Court's conclusion that structural alterations are permissible under the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, thereby resolving conflicting judgments from lower courts.

REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER vs K. JAYACHANDRA ETC. · Niyam