Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-01-09

Kusumben Indersingh Dhupia vs Sudhaben Biharilalji Bhaiya

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 766
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Kusumben Indersingh Dhupia
Respondent
Sudhaben Biharilalji Bhaiya
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
Indira Banerjee, R. Banumathi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the dismissal of the appellant-plaintiff's application for restoration of the suit under Order IX, Rule 9 of the C.P.C. was unjustified, as the appellant had been present in most hearings and the delay was due to the court's inability to take up the matter. The Court emphasized that the presence of the appellant-plaintiff demonstrated interest in pursuing the case, and thus, the High Court's affirmation of the Trial Court's order was set aside. The Court directed the restoration of the suit, allowing the appellant to proceed with the case.

Kusumben Indersingh Dhupia vs Sudhaben Biharilalji Bhaiya · Niyam