Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-01-07

Mahadevappa vs State Of Karnataka Tr.Pub.Prosecutor.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 640
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mahadevappa
Respondent
State Of Karnataka Tr.Pub.Prosecutor.
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Indu Malhotra, Abhay Manohar Sapre

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals against the Bombay High Court's order regarding the sealing of liquor shops under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The Court held that the appellants, who were licensed liquor retailers, were entitled to a hearing before any punitive action was taken against them, as mandated by Section 54 of the M.P. Act. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural fairness in administrative actions affecting licenses, thereby reinforcing the principle of natural justice.

Mahadevappa vs State Of Karnataka Tr.Pub.Prosecutor. · Niyam