Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-22

LULLU VAS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AUDREY LUDWIG VAS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 2018/22874
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
LULLU VAS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AUDREY LUDWIG VAS
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of various provisions under the Indian Evidence Act, particularly focusing on the admissibility of electronic records as evidence. The Court emphasized that under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, electronic records must be accompanied by a certificate to be admissible, establishing a clear procedural requirement. The judgment reinforced the necessity of compliance with statutory provisions for the admissibility of electronic evidence, thereby upholding the principles of fair trial and due process.

LULLU VAS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AUDREY LUDWIG VAS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam