Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-05

THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AFROZ MOHAMMED HASANFATTA

Citation / case number
SC 2017/22717
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent
AFROZ MOHAMMED HASANFATTA
Author
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order taking cognizance of offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477A, and 120-B IPC. The Court found that the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish the involvement of the respondent-accused in the alleged conspiracy to cheat the Government of India through bogus Bills of Entry. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that the cognizance taken was improper.

THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AFROZ MOHAMMED HASANFATTA · Niyam