Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-26

JOSEPH EASWARAN WAPSHARE vs SHIRLEY KATHELEEN WHEELER

Citation / case number
SC 2016/326
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
JOSEPH EASWARAN WAPSHARE
Respondent
SHIRLEY KATHELEEN WHEELER
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the drawer of a cheque is liable for prosecution if the cheque is returned due to insufficient funds and the notice of dishonor is not complied with. The Court emphasized the necessity of sending a legal notice within 30 days of receiving the information regarding the dishonor of the cheque. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the conviction of the appellant under Section 138.

JOSEPH EASWARAN WAPSHARE vs SHIRLEY KATHELEEN WHEELER · Niyam