Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-12

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs M/S. KARAMDEEP FINANCE AND INVESTMENT (I) PVT. LTD..

Citation / case number
SC 2016/28353
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Respondent
M/S. KARAMDEEP FINANCE AND INVESTMENT (I) PVT. LTD..
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals against the Delhi High Court's judgment regarding the sale and conversion of leasehold rights of a property under the Delhi Development Authority Act. The Court held that the DDA's demand for unearned increase was valid under the terms of the Perpetual Lease Deed, specifically clause (4)(a), which requires consent for transfer and payment of unearned increase. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming the DDA's authority to impose such conditions and the legality of the demand raised against M/s. Karamdeep Finance & Investment (I) Pvt. Ltd.

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs M/S. KARAMDEEP FINANCE AND INVESTMENT (I) PVT. LTD.. · Niyam