Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-08

SMT. GOWRAMMA AND ANR. vs SHRI KALINGAPPA (D) REPRESENTED BY LRS. AND ORS

Citation / case number
SC 2014/7623
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SMT. GOWRAMMA AND ANR.
Respondent
SHRI KALINGAPPA (D) REPRESENTED BY LRS. AND ORS
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 300 IPC, the distinction between culpable homicide and murder hinges on the intention and knowledge of the accused at the time of the act. The Court emphasized that the presence of premeditation or the absence of provocation is crucial in determining the degree of culpability. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder.

SMT. GOWRAMMA AND ANR. vs SHRI KALINGAPPA (D) REPRESENTED BY LRS. AND ORS · Niyam