Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-26

COMPETENT AUTHORITY CALCUTTA, UNDER LAND (CEILING AND REGULATION) ACT 1976 AND ANR. vs DAVID MANTOSH AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2014/32035
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMPETENT AUTHORITY CALCUTTA, UNDER LAND (CEILING AND REGULATION) ACT 1976 AND ANR.
Respondent
DAVID MANTOSH AND ORS.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, specifically interpreting Sections 2(o), 2(n), 2(i), 2(l), and 4 of the Act. The Court held that M/s Orient Beverage Ltd. was a 'person' under the Act and was subject to the ceiling limits, thereby affirming the Competent Authority's jurisdiction to regulate excess land holdings. The judgment of the High Court was upheld, confirming the applicability of the Act to the suit property and the authority's actions regarding land ceiling.

COMPETENT AUTHORITY CALCUTTA, UNDER LAND (CEILING AND REGULATION) ACT 1976 AND ANR. vs DAVID MANTOSH AND ORS. · Niyam