Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-28

ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA vs BHAVESH PABARI

Citation / case number
SC 2013/36291
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
Respondent
BHAVESH PABARI
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed two key questions regarding the interpretation of Section 15-J of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act). It held that the conditions in Section 15-J are not exhaustive and that the Adjudicating Officer has discretion in determining the quantum of penalty. Furthermore, the Court clarified that the penalty provisions in Sections 15-A to 15-HA do not eclipse the discretion granted under Section 15-J, thereby affirming the Adjudicating Officer's authority to consider additional factors in penalty assessment.

ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA vs BHAVESH PABARI · Niyam