Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-20

M/S WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA

Citation / case number
SC 2012/17833
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the six-month limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to refund claims made by a buyer when the excise duty was paid under protest by the manufacturer. The Court held that the limitation period does not apply in such cases, allowing the buyer's claim for refund to proceed. The judgment clarified that the buyer is entitled to a refund despite the limitation argument raised by the excise department.

M/S WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA · Niyam