Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-20

M/SSOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. ( A SUBSIDIARY OF COAL INDIA LTD) REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER ( vs THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS

Citation / case number
SC 2011/27701
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/SSOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. ( A SUBSIDIARY OF COAL INDIA LTD) REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER (
Respondent
THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the limitation period of six months under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply when a refund claim is made for central excise duty paid under protest. The Court held that since the manufacturer had paid the duty under protest and the classification dispute was resolved in favor of the manufacturer, the buyer is entitled to claim a refund without being barred by the limitation period. The judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal rejecting the refund claim was set aside, allowing the appeal.

M/SSOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. ( A SUBSIDIARY OF COAL INDIA LTD) REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER ( vs THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS · Niyam