Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-20

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. vs COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.KOLKATA-IV

Citation / case number
SC 2010/5674
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.
Respondent
COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.KOLKATA-IV
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the six-month limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to refund claims made by a buyer when the excise duty was paid by the manufacturer under protest. The Court held that the limitation period does not apply in cases where the duty was paid under protest, allowing the buyer's claim for refund to proceed. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 11B, emphasizing that the buyer is entitled to seek a refund despite the limitation period due to the circumstances of the payment.

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. vs COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.KOLKATA-IV · Niyam