Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-01

G.RATNA RAJ (DEAD) BY LRS. vs SRI MUTHUKUMARASAMY PERMANENT FUND LTD AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2008/10136
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
G.RATNA RAJ (DEAD) BY LRS.
Respondent
SRI MUTHUKUMARASAMY PERMANENT FUND LTD AND ANR.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the preliminary decree dated 25.02.2003 was an ex parte decree, allowing the application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for setting aside the decree. The Court clarified that an ex parte decree can be challenged under the specified provision, thus establishing that the nature of the decree determines the maintainability of such applications. The appeals were allowed, reversing the Single Judge's dismissal of the applications.

G.RATNA RAJ (DEAD) BY LRS. vs SRI MUTHUKUMARASAMY PERMANENT FUND LTD AND ANR. · Niyam