Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-12

BUNDI ZILA PETROL PUMP DEALERS ASSOCIATION BUNDI vs SANYOJAK BUNDI ZILA PETROL MAZDR.SANGH (B.M.S.)

Citation / case number
SC 2007/15816
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BUNDI ZILA PETROL PUMP DEALERS ASSOCIATION BUNDI
Respondent
SANYOJAK BUNDI ZILA PETROL MAZDR.SANGH (B.M.S.)
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 10(1) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, emphasizing that specific performance of a contract can be enforced only when the terms of the contract are clear and unambiguous. The Court held that the absence of clarity in the contract's terms renders it unenforceable, thus upholding the lower court's decision to deny specific performance in this case. The judgment reinforces the principle that contracts must be precise to be legally binding.

BUNDI ZILA PETROL PUMP DEALERS ASSOCIATION BUNDI vs SANYOJAK BUNDI ZILA PETROL MAZDR.SANGH (B.M.S.) · Niyam