Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-20
M/S. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TRICHY/MADURAI
- Citation / case number
- SC 2005/22923
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- M/S. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.
- Respondent
- COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TRICHY/MADURAI
- Author
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
- Bench
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the six-month limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to refund claims made by a buyer when the excise duty was paid under protest by the manufacturer. The Court held that the limitation period does not apply in such cases, affirming that a buyer can claim a refund despite the duty being paid under protest. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 11B, emphasizing that the buyer's right to claim a refund is not barred by the limitation period when the duty was contested.