Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-20

M/S. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TRICHY/MADURAI

Citation / case number
SC 2005/22923
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TRICHY/MADURAI
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the six-month limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to refund claims made by a buyer when the excise duty was paid under protest by the manufacturer. The Court held that the limitation period does not apply in such cases, affirming that a buyer can claim a refund despite the duty being paid under protest. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 11B, emphasizing that the buyer's right to claim a refund is not barred by the limitation period when the duty was contested.

M/S. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TRICHY/MADURAI · Niyam