Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-12

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Mohd. Suleman Siddiqui

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 653
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Respondent
Mohd. Suleman Siddiqui
Author
D.Y. Chandrachud
Bench
Hemant Gupta, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of appointments made under the Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (District Recruitment) Rules 1985, specifically Rule 22, which mandates proper selection procedures. The Court held that the appointments of daily wage employees, including the respondent, were void ab initio due to non-compliance with the recruitment rules. Consequently, the Court remitted the matter back to the High Court for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions in recruitment processes.

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Mohd. Suleman Siddiqui · Niyam