Bayaji Sambhu Mali @Borate(D) Thr. Lrs. vs Nazir Mohammed B.Zari Thr.Poa Hold.

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of Sections 29, 31, and 32F of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, in determining whether the appellant, a tenant, is a deemed purchaser. The Court held that the appellant failed to comply with the notice requirements under Section 32F(1A), leading to the conclusion that the purchase was ineffective. The Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's order, affirming the Tribunal's findings.