Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-12

Chandru @ Chandrasekaran vs State Rep. By Deputy Superintendent Of ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 559
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chandru @ Chandrasekaran
Respondent
State Rep. By Deputy Superintendent Of ...
Author
Deepak Gupta
Bench
S.A. Bobde, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Deepak Gupta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the case concerning the death of Arun, who allegedly died from a drug overdose administered by Venkatesh @ Venki, with the appellants being accused of complicity. The Court noted that the charge-sheet filed under Section 173 CrPC only named Venki as the accused under Section 304 Part II IPC, while the appellants were cited as witnesses. The Court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to implicate the appellants in the crime, leading to their acquittal. The judgment emphasized the necessity of clear evidence for conviction under the IPC.

Chandru @ Chandrasekaran vs State Rep. By Deputy Superintendent Of ... · Niyam