Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-15

Prof. R.K. Vijayasarathy vs Sudha Seetharam

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 534
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Prof. R.K. Vijayasarathy
Respondent
Sudha Seetharam
Author
D.Y. Chandrachud
Bench
Hemant Gupta, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to reject the appellants' plea to quash the FIR filed under Sections 405, 406, 415, and 420 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming that the allegations in the complaint disclosed sufficient ingredients to constitute an offence. The Court noted that the criminal proceedings were not an abuse of process, as the matter involved serious allegations of collusion and misappropriation of funds. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the criminal proceedings to continue.

Prof. R.K. Vijayasarathy vs Sudha Seetharam · Niyam