Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-28

Neeraj Dutta vs State(Govt.Of N.C.T.Of Delhi)

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2019 SC 515
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Neeraj Dutta
Respondent
State(Govt.Of N.C.T.Of Delhi)
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
R. Subhash Reddy, R. Banumathi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, affirming the High Court's decision. The Court established that the prosecution must prove both the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification, and the absence of the complainant's testimony does not negate the evidence provided by the shadow witness. The appellant's appeal was dismissed, maintaining the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the trial court.

Neeraj Dutta vs State(Govt.Of N.C.T.Of Delhi) · Niyam