Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-25

Shri Revansiddeshwar Pattan Sahakari ... vs Taluka Tokrekoli (Ambiga Samaji C Vikas ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 1126
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shri Revansiddeshwar Pattan Sahakari ...
Respondent
Taluka Tokrekoli (Ambiga Samaji C Vikas ...
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Dinesh Maheshwari, Abhay Manohar Sapre

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's order partially allowing the writ petition was not justified, as it granted injunction in favor of the plaintiff while confirming the injunction for the defendant. The Court emphasized the need for a balanced approach in injunction matters under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and remanded the case back to the High Court for reconsideration. The outcome was that the appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order was set aside.

Shri Revansiddeshwar Pattan Sahakari ... vs Taluka Tokrekoli (Ambiga Samaji C Vikas ... · Niyam