Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-22

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Dhruv Gurjar

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 1106
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Respondent
Dhruv Gurjar
Author
M.R. Shah
Bench
M.R. Shah, L. Nageswara Rao

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's decision to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 307, 294, and 34 IPC, based on a compromise between the accused and the complainant, was improper. The Court emphasized that such serious offences, particularly those involving attempted murder, cannot be resolved merely through compromise, as public interest and the gravity of the crime must be considered. The appeal by the State of Madhya Pradesh was allowed, reinstating the criminal proceedings against the accused.

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Dhruv Gurjar · Niyam