Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-02-14

Gagan Kumar vs The State Of Punjab

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 1009
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Gagan Kumar
Respondent
The State Of Punjab
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Dinesh Maheshwari, Abhay Manohar Sapre

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, a Magistrate must specify whether sentences for multiple convictions run concurrently or consecutively. The Court found that the Judicial Magistrate failed to comply with this requirement when convicting the appellant under Sections 279 and 304-A of the IPC. Consequently, the Court modified the order to ensure the sentences run concurrently, thereby allowing the appeal.

Gagan Kumar vs The State Of Punjab · Niyam