Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2019

Supreme Court of India · 2019-12-18

M/S CEE CEE AND CEE CEES vs K. DEVAMANI

Citation / case number
SC 2019/13882
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S CEE CEE AND CEE CEES
Respondent
K. DEVAMANI
Author
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Deputy Commissioner (Excise), Karaikal, to permit the shifting of the Appellant's liquor shop from Mahe to Karaikal under Rules 163 and 209 of the Puducherry Excise Rules, 1970. The Court clarified that the interpretation of 'place' in the context of shifting licenses does not restrict movement within the Union Territory, thereby rejecting the objections raised by Respondent No. 1 based on prior judgments. The Court emphasized that the shifting was not contrary to public interest as claimed, and thus the appeal was allowed.

M/S CEE CEE AND CEE CEES vs K. DEVAMANI · Niyam